Kohesi: Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi

Articles

Vol. 11 No. 2 (2026): Kohesi: Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi, ISSN 3025-1311

ANALISIS KINERJA SEISMIK STRUKTUR BANGUNAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE PUSHOVER: SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW TERHADAP TREN RISET GLOBAL 2020–2026

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2238/rrdyvz48
Submitted
July 18, 2026
Published
2026-07-18

Abstract

Wilayah rawan gempa di berbagai belahan dunia menghadapi tantangan besar dalam memastikan keandalan struktur bangunan terhadap beban seismik. Analisis pushover (analisis statik nonlinier) telah menjadi salah satu pendekatan utama untuk mengevaluasi kinerja seismik struktur bangunan karena mampu menggambarkan perilaku struktur dari kondisi elastis hingga inelastis melalui kurva kapasitas (capacity curve) dan titik kinerja (performance point). Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis secara sistematis perkembangan riset mengenai asesmen kinerja seismik struktur bangunan berbasis metode pushover, berdasarkan publikasi ilmiah terindeks Scopus periode 2020–2026. Penelitian menggunakan metode Systematic Literature Review (SLR) dengan pedoman PRISMA 2020. Pencarian literatur dilakukan melalui Publish or Perish (PoP) terhadap database Scopus dan menghasilkan 200 rekaman unik; setelah proses skrining judul, penilaian kelayakan (jenis dokumen dan ketersediaan DOI), serta prioritisasi berbasis dampak dan relevansi tematik, diperoleh 45 artikel yang memenuhi kriteria inklusi untuk disintesis. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa: (1) fokus penelitian terbagi ke dalam delapan kategori tematik, dengan kinerja perkuatan/retrofit struktur (22,2%) dan asesmen kinerja seismik umum (17,8%) sebagai kategori terbanyak; (2) interaksi tanah–struktur, ketidakberaturan konfigurasi bangunan, dan pemilihan sistem struktur penahan beban lateral (dinding geser, diagrid, bresing) terbukti secara konsisten memengaruhi signifikan respons dan tingkat kinerja seismik bangunan; (3) mayoritas artikel (86,7%) dipublikasikan pada jurnal kuartil Q1–Q2 Scopus, menunjukkan kredibilitas ilmiah yang tinggi pada korpus yang disintesis. Analisis bibliometrik VOSViewer terhadap kata kunci menunjukkan keterkaitan erat antara istilah 'study', 'performance assessment', 'force', dan 'code', dengan klaster studi kasus regional pascagempa (seperti Adıyaman, Türkiye) sebagai simpul tematik yang menonjol. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa metode pushover tetap relevan sebagai pendekatan evaluasi kinerja seismik yang praktis dan efektif, namun keandalan hasilnya perlu didukung oleh pertimbangan interaksi tanah–struktur, konfigurasi bangunan, dan strategi retrofit yang sesuai dengan karakteristik struktur eksisting.

References

  1. Applied Technology Council. (1996). Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings (ATC-40). Applied Technology Council.
  2. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  3. Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2000). Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings (FEMA 356). FEMA.
  4. Kitchenham, B., Budgen, D., Brereton, P., Turner, M., Charters, S., & Linkman, S. (2007). Large-scale software engineering questions - expert opinion or empirical evidence? IET Software, 1(5), 161-171. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-sen:20060052
  5. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hrobjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., ... Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  6. Pawirodikromo, W. (2012). Seismologi teknik dan rekayasa kegempaan (Cetakan 1). Pustaka Pelajar.
  7. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2009). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
  8. Acharya, O. et al. (2023). Confined masonry in seismic regions: Application to a prototype building in Nepal. Structures, 47, 2281-2299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.12.045
  9. Aguayo, R. et al. (2024). Evaluating seismic performance in reinforced concrete buildings with complex shear walls: A focus on a residential case in Chile. Buildings, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14030761
  10. Bassurucu, M. et al. (2025). Seismic performance assessment of an RC building due to 2023 Türkiye earthquakes: A case study in Adıyaman, Türkiye. Buildings, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15040521
  11. Bianchi, S. et al. (2021). Comparison of traditional vs low-damage structural and non-structural building systems through a cost/performance-based evaluation. Earthquake Spectra, 37(1), 366-385. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293020952445
  12. Chourasia, A. et al. (2020). Seismic performance assessment of two-storey precast reinforced concrete building. Structural Concrete, 21(5), 2011-2027. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201900146
  13. De Risi, M.T. et al. (2023). Modelling and seismic response analysis of Italian pre-code and low-code reinforced concrete buildings. Part I: Bare frames. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 27(6), 1482-1513. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2022.2074919
  14. Firoj, M. et al. (2022). Effect of nonlinear soil−structure interaction and lateral stiffness on seismic performance of mid−rise RC building. Journal of Building Engineering, 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105096
  15. Golait, T. et al. (2025). Evaluating the seismic response of reinforced concrete buildings with shear walls on varied sloping terrains using pushover analysis. Archives for Technical Sciences, 1(32), 120-131. https://doi.org/10.70102/afts.2025.1732.120
  16. Hentri, M. et al. (2021). Vulnerability of asymmetric multi-storey buildings in the context of performance-based seismic design. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 25(5), 813-834. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2018.1548380
  17. Işik, E. et al. (2021). Time-dependent model for earthquake occurrence and effects of design spectra on structural performance: A case study from the north anatolian fault zone, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, 30(2), 215-234. https://doi.org/10.3906/yer-2004-20
  18. Janous, S.E. et al. (2024). Soil-structure interaction influence on the seismic performance of buildings. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 12(2), 798-813. https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2024.120210
  19. Jin, J. et al. (2023). Seismic and collapse behavior of existing high-rise steel buildings under long-period earthquakes. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2023.108151
  20. Joseph, R. et al. (2023). Shake-table testing and numerical simulation to select the FRCM retrofit solution for flexure/shear deficient RC frames. Journal of Building Engineering, 69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106248
  21. Kadhim, Y.M. et al. (2025). Numerical simulation of soil-structure interaction on the seismic response of reinforced concrete buildings. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 26(7), 2869-2885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-025-01349-0
  22. Kheyroddin, A. et al. (2020). Seismic evaluation of reinforced concrete moment frames retrofitted with steel braces using IDA and pushover methods in the near-fault field. Amirkabir Journal of Civil Engineering, 52(5), 1127-1142. https://doi.org/10.22060/ceej.2018.15235.5858
  23. Khokhar, S.A. et al. (2024). A comparative study on the seismic performance of long span engineered cementitious composite (ECC) structures. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03129
  24. Kong, S. et al. (2022). Influence of BRBs deformation capacity on the seismic performance of RC building frames. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107442
  25. Kumar, A. et al. (2025). Assessment of soil amplification effects on the seismic vulnerability of irregular reinforced concrete buildings of varying heights. Scientific Reports, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-14145-2
  26. Kumar, A. et al. (2026). Seismic vulnerability mitigation of RC building in reclassified seismic zone through fiber-reinforced concrete retrofitting as jacketing in cover region. International Journal of Protective Structures, 17(2), 444-470. https://doi.org/10.1177/20414196251374715
  27. Kumar, R. et al. (2025). Seismic performance assessment of building retrofitted with superelastic shape memory alloy steel slit damper (SMA-SSD). Journal of Building Engineering, 111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2025.113208
  28. Li, X. et al. (2022). Assessment on the seismic performance of circular tubed reinforced concrete column to steel beam frames using numerical modeling. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107567
  29. Liu, C. et al. (2023). Diagrid core-tube structure seismic performance based on equivalent stiffness ratio of inner and outer tubes. Ksce Journal of Civil Engineering, 27(4), 1682-1696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-023-0677-9
  30. Madheswaran, C.K. et al. (2022). Development of retrofitting technique for seismically vulnerable open ground storey reinforced concrete buildings. Experimental Techniques, 46(1), 43-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-021-00456-2
  31. Meglio, E. et al. (2024). Seismic design and analysis of a cold-formed steel exoskeleton for the retrofit of an RC multi-story residential building. Applied Sciences Switzerland, 14(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/app14198674
  32. Mokhtari, M. et al. (2022). Development, seismic performance and collapse evaluation of steel moment-resisting knee braced frame. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107262
  33. Murugan, K. et al. (2020). Seismic performance of strengthened reinforced concrete columns. Structures, 27, 487-505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.05.059
  34. Naiel, A. et al. (2025). Assessing seismic performance of mid-rise reinforced concrete buildings using fragility curves. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-024-01750-9
  35. Ramos, L. et al. (2021). Seismic response of reinforced concrete wall buildings with nonlinear coupling slabs. Engineering Structures, 234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.111888
  36. Sayar, S. et al. (2021). Systematic strengthening scenarios for determination of most suitable retrofitting approach in a low-rise RC building. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00782
  37. Shafigh, A. et al. (2021). Seismic investigation of cyclic pushover method for regular reinforced concrete bridge. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 78(1), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2021.78.1.041
  38. Shendkar, M.R. et al. (2025). Seismic evaluation and retrofit of reinforced concrete structures. Journal of Infrastructure Preservation and Resilience, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43065-024-00114-y
  39. Tan, M. et al. (2025). Effect of infill walls on the seismic performance of a severely damaged substandard RC building during the February 6, 2023, Kahramanmaras earthquake sequence. Engineering Failure Analysis, 169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.109117
  40. Zhang, J. et al. (2021). Performance-based design method and pushover analysis on steel plate and concrete composite coupled shear walls. Progress in Steel Building Structures, 23(3), 12-53. https://doi.org/10.13969/j.cnki.cn31-1893.2021.03.002
  41. Andriani, W. (2021). Penggunaan Metode Sistematik Literatur Review dalam Penelitian Ilmu Sosiologi. Jurnal PTK Dan Pendidikan, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.18592/ptk.v7i2.5632
  42. Broberg, M. (2022). Capacity Design of Coupled Composite Plate Shear Wall-Concrete-Filled System. Journal of Structural Engineering United States, 148(4). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003296
  43. Darwanto, A. (2024). DASAR-DASAR ILMU RISET.
  44. Demirtaş, Y. (2025). Investigation of code based criteria for soft-story irregularity. Structures, 80(Query date: 2026-07-11 15:46:46). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2025.109668
  45. Fauzan, M., Caniago, M. A. I., Abdullah, R. S., & Nasirin, W. K. (2026). Pemetaan Riset Pembayaran Berbasis Quick Response (QR) dalam Perbankan Syariah: Analisis Bibliometrik atas Evolusi dan Isolasi Tematik. Jurnal Masharif Al-Syariah: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Perbankan Syariah, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.30651/jms.v11i1.30724
  46. Heshmati, M. (2020). Seismic performance assessment of tubular diagrid structures with varying angles in tall steel buildings. Structures, 25(Query date: 2026-07-11 15:46:46), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.02.030
  47. Işık, E. (2026). Enhancing the seismic safety of upgraded RC buildings using FRP retrofitting: Analytical and field evidence from the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 24(3), 1467–1501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-025-02338-z
  48. Joseph, R. (2022). Seismic performance upgrade of substandard RC buildings with different structural systems using advanced retrofit techniques. Journal of Building Engineering, 59(Query date: 2026-07-11 15:46:46). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105155
  49. Liu, C. (2022). Seismic fragility estimates of steel diagrid structure with performance-based tests for high-rise buildings. Journal of Building Engineering, 52(Query date: 2026-07-11 15:46:46). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104459
  50. Mahdavipour, M. A. (2020). Seismic evaluation of ordinary RC buildings retrofitted with externally bonded FRPs using a reliability-based approach. Composite Structures, 232(Query date: 2026-07-11 15:46:46). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111567
  51. Mouhine, M. (2022). Seismic vulnerability assessment of RC buildings with setback irregularity. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2021.05.001
  52. Pawirodikromo, H. (2012). Seismologi Teknik dan Rekayasa Kegempaan (Cetakan 1). Yogyakarta Pustaka Pelajar.
  53. Requena-Garcia-Cruz, M. V. (2022). Seismic Assessment of RC Buildings Considering the Influence of Vertical Irregularities: Framed and Wall-Frame Structures. Geotechnical Geological and Earthquake Engineering, 50(Query date: 2026-07-11 15:46:46), 287–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83221-6_24
  54. Tahghighi, H. (2020). Numerical Evaluation of Soil-Structure Interaction Effects on the Seismic Performance and Vulnerability of Reinforced Concrete Buildings. International Journal of Geomechanics, 20(6). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001651
  55. Worku, A. M. (2022). An improved first-mode-based pushover analytical procedure for assessing seismic performance of special moment resisting frame building structures. Engineering Structures, 252(Query date: 2026-07-11 15:46:46). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113587
  56. Yudistira, H. (2025). Systematic Literatur Review Dengan Metode Prisma: Efektivitas Komunikasi Profesional dalam Penyusunan dan Penyampaian Strategi Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia di Era Digital.

Similar Articles

11-20 of 329

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.