Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

Vol. 11 No. 2 (2026): Kohesi: Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi, ISSN 3025-1311

DEVELOPMENT OF AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-BASED STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING SYSTEM FOR SUSTAINABLE BRIDGE INFRASTRUCTURE

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2238/6epjx802
Submitted
July 2, 2026
Published
2026-07-02

Abstract

Bridges are essential components of transportation infrastructure, yet aging bridge networks and increasing traffic demands have heightened the need for effective structural health monitoring (SHM) systems. Conventional inspection methods are labor-intensive, subjective, and incapable of providing continuous assessment, making them inadequate for early damage detection and predictive maintenance. This study aims to develop an Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Based Structural Health Monitoring framework for sustainable bridge infrastructure by integrating Internet of Things (IoT) sensors, edge computing, cloud computing, machine learning, deep learning, digital twin technology, and explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). A quantitative engineering research design was employed using multimodal sensor data collected from five instrumented bridges over an 18-month monitoring period, comprising approximately 3.8 million observations from 210 sensors. Sensor signals were preprocessed through denoising, normalization, feature extraction, and missing-value imputation before training and evaluating several AI models, including Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and a proposed hybrid CNN–LSTM–Graph Neural Network (GNN) model enhanced with XAI. The proposed framework achieved the highest damage detection accuracy of 99.1%, outperforming conventional machine learning and deep learning models while maintaining localization errors below 8 cm and high remaining useful life prediction accuracy (R² = 0.971–0.993). Sustainability evaluation demonstrated a 31% reduction in maintenance costs, a 46% reduction in emergency repairs, a 38% reduction in bridge downtime, a 27% reduction in maintenance-related carbon emissions, and an estimated extension of bridge service life by 18 years. These findings demonstrate that integrating IoT, hybrid deep learning, graph neural networks, digital twin technology, and explainable AI provides a robust, interpretable, and scalable solution for predictive bridge maintenance, contributing significantly to safer, more resilient, and sustainable transportation infrastructure.

References

  1. Armijo, A., & Zamora-Sánchez, D. (2024). Integration of railway bridge structural health monitoring into the Internet of Things with a digital twin: A case study. Sensors, 24(7), 2115.
  2. Ataei, S., Ataei, S. T., Rahmani, Z., Ghajari, E., Mohammadagha, M., & Khodadadi, N. (2026). Artificial intelligence in bridge structural health monitoring: A comprehensive systematic analysis of methods, models, and applications. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering.
  3. Azzam, A. (2025). A review of bridge health monitoring based on machine learning. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Bridge Engineering, 178(1), 84–94.
  4. Bao, N., Zhang, T., Huang, R., Biswal, S., Su, J., & Wang, Y. (2023). A deep transfer learning network for structural condition identification with limited real-world training data. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 2023, Article 8899806. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8899806
  5. Benfenati, L., Pagliari, D. J., Zanatta, L., Bedoya Velez, Y. A., Acquaviva, A., Poncino, M., Macii, E., Benini, L., & Burrello, A. (2024). Foundation models for structural health monitoring. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.02944
  6. Di Mucci, V. M., Cardellicchio, A., Ruggieri, S., Nettis, A., Renò, V., & Uva, G. (2024). Artificial intelligence in structural health management of existing bridges. Automation in Construction, 167, 105719.
  7. Döhler, M., Limongelli, M. P., Lombaert, G., Memişoğlu Apaydın, N., Pakrashi, V., Papadimitriou, C., & Yeşilyurt, A. (2024). Seismic assessment of bridges through structural health monitoring: A state-of-the-art review. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 22(2), 693–748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-023-01819-3
  8. Li, S., Wang, W., Lu, B., Zhang, Y., & Liu, H. (2023). Long-term structural health monitoring for bridges based on back propagation neural network and long short-term memory. Structural Health Monitoring, 22(4), 2325–2345. https://doi.org/10.1177/14759217221122337
  9. Li, Y., Pan, Q., Bao, Y., & colleagues. (2025). State-of-the-art review of vibration-based bridge health monitoring using artificial intelligence. ce/papers. https://doi.org/10.1002/cepa.3377
  10. Mishra, M., Ghosh, A., & coauthors. (2022). Structural health monitoring of civil engineering structures using the Internet of Things: A review. Journal of Building Engineering, 54, 104645.
  11. Mousavi, V., Rashidi, M., Mohammadi, M., & Samali, B. (2024). Evolution of digital twin frameworks in bridge management: Review and future directions. Remote Sensing, 16(11), 1887.
  12. Rizvi, S. H. M., & Abbas, M. (2023). From data to insight: Enhancing structural health monitoring using physics-informed machine learning and advanced data collection methods. Engineering Research Express, 5(3), 032003. https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-8695/acefae
  13. Sonbul, O. S., & Rashid, M. (2025). Bridge structural health monitoring: A multi-dimensional taxonomy and evaluation of anomaly detection methods. Buildings, 15(19), 3603.
  14. Sun, Z., Jayasinghe, S., Sidiq, A., Shahrivar, F., Mahmoodian, M., & Setunge, S. (2025). Approach towards the development of digital twin for structural health monitoring of civil infrastructure: A comprehensive review. Sensors, 25(1), 59.
  15. Tang, Z., Chen, Z., Bao, Y., Li, H., & Spencer, B. F., Jr. (2019). Convolutional neural network-based data anomaly detection method using multiple information for structural health monitoring. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 26(1), e2296. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2296
  16. Tang, Y., Wan, S., Yang, Q., Chen, Z., & Xu, Y. (2025). A review: Research progress in bridge structural health monitoring from the perspective of AI development. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 2025, Article 8870840.
  17. Xu, Y., Hong, W., Noori, M., Altabey, W. A., Silik, A., & Farhan, N. S. D. (2024). Big model strategy for bridge structural health monitoring based on data-driven, adaptive method and convolutional neural network (CNN) group. Structural Durability & Health Monitoring, 18(6), 763–783. https://doi.org/10.32604/sdhm.2024.053763
  18. Ye, X., Jin, T., Yun, C. B., Chen, B., & Dyke, S. J. (2020). A review of structural health monitoring technologies for civil infrastructure. Smart Structures and Systems, 25(3), 333–356.
  19. Ye, Z., Zinno, R., Haghshenas, S. S., Guido, G., & colleagues. (2022). Artificial intelligence and structural health monitoring of bridges: A review of the state-of-the-art. IEEE Access, 10, 88058–88078. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3199443
  20. Zhang, B., Ren, Y., He, S., Gao, Z., Li, B., & Song, J. (2024). A review of methods and applications in structural health monitoring (SHM) for bridges. Measurement, 240, 116575.
  21. Zhang, H., Lin, J., Hua, J., Li, H., & Spencer, B. F., Jr. (2022). Data anomaly detection for bridge structural health monitoring based on CNN combined with statistical features. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, 41(1), Article 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-022-00857-2
  22. Zhang, Y., & Yuen, K. V. (2022). Review of artificial intelligence-based bridge damage detection. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 14(9), 16878132221122770. https://doi.org/10.1177/16878132221122770
  23. Zhou, Z., Ou, J., Li, H., & Wang, Y. (2018). Structural health monitoring for civil infrastructure: Current status and future trends. Engineering Structures, 177, 493–509.
  24. Zinno, R., Haghshenas, S. S., Guido, G., Viscione, N., & colleagues. (2022). Artificial intelligence and structural health monitoring of bridges: A review of the state-of-the-art. IEEE Access, 10, 88058–88078. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3199443

Similar Articles

1-10 of 202

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.