DIPLOMATIC RELIGION DALAM DINAMIKA DIPLOMASI MODERN: PERKEMBANGAN PERAN AGAMA SEBAGAI INSTRUMEN DIALOG, KERJA SAMA, DAN PERDAMAIAN DALAM HUBUNGAN INTERNASIONAL

• Ismi Nur Azizah

  Faculty of Social Science and Law, Universitas Negeri Makassar

  Author

• Juwita Putry Anwar

  Faculty of Social Science and Law, Universitas Negeri Makassar

  Author

• Irsyad Dhahri

  Faculty of Social Science and Law, Universitas Negeri Makassar

  Author

Abu-Nimer, M. (2003). Nonviolence and peace building in Islam: Theory and practice. University Press of Florida.

Abu-Nimer, M., & Smith, R. K. (2016). Interreligious and intercultural education for dialogue, peace and social cohesion. International Review of Education, 62(4), 393–405.

Appleby, R. S. (2000). The ambivalence of the sacred: Religion, violence, and reconciliation. Rowman & Littlefield.

Araujo, R. J., & Lucal, J. A. (2004). Papal diplomacy and the quest for peace: The Vatican and international organizations from the early years to the modern era. Sapientia Press.

Bartoli, A. (1999). Mediating peace in Mozambique: The role of the Community of Sant'Egidio. Dalam C. A. Crocker, F. O. Hampson, & P. Aall (Eds.), Herding cats: Multiparty mediation in a complex world (hlm. 245–273). United States Institute of Peace Press.

Beach, D., & Pedersen, R. B. (2013). Process-tracing methods: Foundations and guidelines. University of Michigan Press.

Bercovitch, J., & Kadayifci-Orellana, S. A. (2009). Religion and mediation: The role of faith-based actors in international conflict resolution. International Negotiation, 14(1), 175–204.

Berger, P. L. (Ed.). (1999). The desecularization of the world: Resurgent religion and world politics. Eerdmans.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Bush, R. (2009). Nahdlatul Ulama and the struggle for power within Islam and politics in Indonesia. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Casanova, J. (1994). Public religions in the modern world. University of Chicago Press.

Cavanaugh, W. T. (2009). The myth of religious violence: Secular ideology and the roots of modern conflict. Oxford University Press.

Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Dewan Keamanan PBB. (1992). Resolusi 797 (1992) tentang Operasi PBB di Mozambik.

Diamond, L., & McDonald, J. (1996). Multi-track diplomacy: A systems approach to peace (3rd ed.). Kumarian Press.

Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.

Fox, J., & Sandler, S. (2004). Bringing religion into international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.

Garrett, J. L. (1985). The Beagle Channel dispute: Confrontation and negotiation in the Southern Cone. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 27(3), 81–109.

George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press.

• PDF