PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA MELALUI ARBITRASE DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM INDONESIA

Authors
  • Ahmad Aditya S.

    Universitas pamulang
    Author
  • Ariyanto

    Universitas pamulang
    Author
  • .Tewa Zulghafir A.R.

    Universitas pamulang
    Author
Keywords:
Arbitration, Commercial Disputes, Award Enforcement, Indonesian Law
Abstract
The preference of business actors for arbitration over ordinary courts is not without reason. The character of commercial disputes, which demands speed, confidentiality, and adjudicators familiar with technical transactional matters, often renders conventional litigation forums inadequate. This article examines the position of arbitration within the Indonesian legal order, focusing on two matters: first, the juridical foundation underlying the validity of arbitration as a legitimate dispute settlement forum; second, the obstacles arising when arbitral awards, both domestic and international, must be enforced before district courts. The study employs a normative approach by examining Law Number 30 of 1999, several Supreme Court decisions, and the practice of the Indonesian National Board of Arbitration (BANI). The findings show that although the textual framework of Indonesian arbitration law is reasonably adequate, tension frequently arises at the registration and enforcement stage, particularly when district courts re-examine the substance of disputes that should fall within the arbitrator's final authority.
References

Peraturan Perundang-undangan dan Konvensi

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.

Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1999 Nomor 138.

Keputusan Presiden Nomor 34 Tahun 1981 tentang Pengesahan Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards 1958.

Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards 1958 (New York Convention).

UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1985 (amandemen 2006).

Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2016 tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Permohonan Eksekusi Putusan Arbitrase.

Buku

Abdurrasyid, Priyatna. Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa: Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Fikahati Aneska, 2002.

Adolf, Huala. Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Internasional. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2017.

Born, Gary B. International Commercial Arbitration. Edisi ke-2. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2014.

Emirzon, Joni. Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2001.

Gautama, Sudargo. Arbitrase Dagang Internasional. Bandung: Alumni, 1979.

Gautama, Sudargo. Indonesian Business Law. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2002.

Harahap, M. Yahya. Arbitrase. Edisi ke-2. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2003.

Margono, Suyud. ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) dan Arbitrase: Proses Pelembagaan dan Aspek Hukum. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia, 2004.

Rajagukguk, Erman. Arbitrase dalam Putusan Pengadilan. Jakarta: Chandra Pratama, 2000.

Soemartono, Gatot. Arbitrase dan Mediasi di Indonesia. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2006.

Winarta, Frans Hendra. Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa: Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia dan Internasional. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2012.

Putusan Pengadilan dan Dokumen Lain

Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 444 PK/Pdt/2007 (Pertamina melawan Karaha Bodas Company).

Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 01 K/Pdt.Sus/2010 (PT Pertamina (Persero) melawan PT Lirik Petroleum).

Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 877 K/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2018 (Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase BANI).

Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Nomor 86/Pdt.G/2002/PN.Jkt.Pst.

Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia (BANI). Laporan Tahunan Penyelesaian Perkara BANI 2022.

Cover Image
Downloads
Published
2026-06-27
Section
Articles

How to Cite

PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA MELALUI ARBITRASE DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM INDONESIA. (2026). Causa: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kewarganegaraan, 16(8). https://doi.org/10.2238/r77z9816

Similar Articles

31-40 of 50

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.