Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

Vol. 11 No. 5 (2026): Kohesi: Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi, ISSN 3025-1311

OPTIMALISASI INFORMASI HAK INTEGRASI WARGA BINAAN MELALUI MADING DAN QR CODE

Submitted
October 24, 2026
Published
2026-10-24

Abstract

Keterbatasan akses terhadap informasi yang jelas dan seragam dapat menghambat warga binaan serta keluarganya dalam memahami hak integrasi pemasyarakatan. Kegiatan pengabdian ini mengembangkan SIPAHAM (Sistem Informasi dan Pemahaman Hak Administratif Warga Binaan) di Lapas Narkotika Kelas IIA Tanjungpinang melalui kombinasi papan informasi atau mading dan Quick Response (QR) code. Program dilaksanakan pada 25 Juni–5 Agustus 2026 menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif-partisipatif yang meliputi asesmen kebutuhan, kajian regulasi dan literatur, penyusunan serta validasi materi, produksi media, pemasangan, sosialisasi, monitoring, dan serah terima. Materi mencakup Pembebasan Bersyarat, Cuti Bersyarat, remisi, asimilasi, dokumen persyaratan, dan alur pengusulan. Ketercapaian dinilai secara deskriptif berdasarkan ketersediaan dan kemudahan akses media, keseragaman informasi, pemanfaatan awal, umpan balik petugas, serta kemudahan pembaruan konten digital. Program menghasilkan media informasi permanen pada area layanan dan QR code berukuran 5 × 5 cm dalam dudukan akrilik. Monitoring awal menunjukkan bahwa media hibrida memberikan rujukan yang lebih mudah diakses dan lebih seragam bagi pengguna maupun petugas. Namun, kegiatan belum menggunakan pre-test dan post-test terstandar, analitik pemindaian, maupun kelompok pembanding, sehingga peningkatan pemahaman belum dapat dinyatakan secara kuantitatif. SIPAHAM menunjukkan bahwa lapisan informasi fisik-digital berbiaya rendah dapat mendukung transparansi dan aksesibilitas pelayanan pemasyarakatan apabila tetap dilengkapi pendampingan langsung oleh petugas.

References

  1. Bagheri-Nesami, M., Kamali, M., & Mollaei, A. (2025). Comparison of the effect of quick response code-based training and traditional methods on the knowledge, skill, and satisfaction of the nursing students in using medical device. Smart Learning Environments, 12, Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-025-00364-7
  2. Brottveit, G., & Fransson, E. (2024). How far does prison punishment extend? Re-entry processes in the digitalised society. Critical Criminology, 32, 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-023-09722-8
  3. Díaz-León, J. A., Arbelaitz, O., & Arruarte, A. (2024). Introduction to informatics in a Peruvian penitentiary using CS unplugged: From university to penitentiary. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 971–989. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12336-w
  4. Hadlington, L., & Knight, V. (2022). Public acceptability of prisoners' access and use of digital technologies in the UK. The Prison Journal, 102(2), 237–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/00328855221079290
  5. Hart, A. (2023). Information and communications technology access for people in prison: Strategies to maximise the benefits and minimise the harms of communication with families and program workers. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 35(4), 500–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2023.2210788
  6. Hofinger, V., & Pflegerl, P. (2024). A reality check on the digitalisation of prisons: Assessing the opportunities and risks of providing digital technologies for prisoners. Punishment & Society, 26(5), 898–916. https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745241237190
  7. Hopkins, S. (2022). Beyond digital literacy in Australian prisons: Theorizing "network literacy," intersectionality, and female incarcerated students. Media and Communication, 10(4), 382–390. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i4.5734
  8. Imandeka, E., Hidayanto, A. N., & Mahmud, M. (2024). Smart prison technology and challenges: A systematic literature reviews. IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 13(2), 1214–1226. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijai.v13.i2.pp1214-1226
  9. Imandeka, E., Hidayanto, A. N., Oktavia Hadi Putra, P., & Mahmud, M. (2026). Building smart prisons: Developing a context-specific digital transformation framework for Indonesia. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 6(1), Article 100405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2026.100405
  10. Järveläinen, E., & Rantanen, T. (2024). Realisation of the principle of normalisation in the adoption of ICTs in a women's prison: A Finnish qualitative study. Journal of Criminology, 57(3), 334–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/26338076231211014
  11. Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia. (2022). Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 Tahun 2022 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Nomor 3 Tahun 2018 tentang Syarat dan Tata Cara Pemberian Remisi, Asimilasi, Cuti Mengunjungi Keluarga, Pembebasan Bersyarat, Cuti Menjelang Bebas, dan Cuti Bersyarat. Berita Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2022 Nomor 117.
  12. Lourenço, R. P. (2023). A framework for public eServices transparency. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 19(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.317415
  13. McKay, C. (2022). The carceral automaton: Digital prisons and technologies of detention. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 11(1), 100–119. https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.2137
  14. Meneses-Monroy, A., Rivas-Paterna, A. B., Orgaz-Rivas, E., García-González, F. J., González-Sanavia, M. J., Moreno, G., & Pacheco, E. (2023). Use of infographics for facilitating learning of pharmacology in the nursing degree. Nursing Open, 10(3), 1611–1618. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1413
  15. Nkosinkulu, Z. (2024). Visualizing education: Infographics and pop-up edutainment exhibitions. Journal of Visual Literacy, 43(3), 250–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051144X.2024.2396253
  16. Republik Indonesia. (2022). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 22 Tahun 2022 tentang Pemasyarakatan. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2022 Nomor 165.
  17. Ross, S., Wood, M. A., Baird, R., & Lundberg, K. (2024). Shaping the techno-social landscape of corrections: How values, technology, and culture influence the design of correctional service delivery applications. Journal of Criminology, 57(3), 294–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/26338076241255530
  18. Saldanha, D. M. F., Dias, C. N., & Guillaumon, S. (2022). Transparency and accountability in digital public services: Learning from the Brazilian cases. Government Information Quarterly, 39(2), Article 101680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101680
  19. Shokri, S., Mohammadi, S., & Qanbari Qalehsari, M. (2026). A QR code-based intervention to improve nursing documentation quality: A quasi-experimental study. BMC Nursing, 25, Article 475. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-026-04604-0
  20. Zivanai, E., & Mahlangu, G. (2022). Digital prison rehabilitation and successful re-entry into a digital society: A systematic literature review on the new reality on prison rehabilitation. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1), Article 2116809. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2116809

Similar Articles

61-70 of 141

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.