THE BATTLE OF IDENTITY: A COMPARATIVE SOCIOLINGUISTIC STUDY OF SPEECH ACCOMMODATION BETWEEN UHTRED AND BRIDA IN THE LAST KINGDOM

Main Article Content

Nadiah

Abstract

This study aims to analyse the speech accommodation strategy from historical drama series, namely The Last Kingdom. Analyzing Uhtred and Brida’s utterances uses speech accommodation strategy by Howard Giles (2016) three strategies, including convergence, divergence, and maintenance. The author found all three strategies in the 10 data collected, which consist 4 convergence, 4 divergence, and 2 maintenance cases. After classifying the dialogues according to the speech accommodation strategy, the author now uses Tajfel and Turner (1979) Social Identity Theory to assess the cultural loyalties or psychological defense mechanism of the characters. The assessment covers 2 aspects, namely: In-group favoritism, and Out-group discrimination. This study shows that Uhtred managed to use convergence well to survive among the Saxons and Brida used divergence and did not adapt to the Saxon culture. It also shows the importance of speech accommodation strategy selection and social identity assessment in a cultural conflict.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

THE BATTLE OF IDENTITY: A COMPARATIVE SOCIOLINGUISTIC STUDY OF SPEECH ACCOMMODATION BETWEEN UHTRED AND BRIDA IN THE LAST KINGDOM. (2026). Argopuro: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.2238/w9rbez24

References

Abbott, M.L., & Mckinney, J. (2013) Understanding and applying research design. John Wiley & Sons.

Dragojevic, M., Gasiorek, J., & Giles, H. (2016). Accommodative strategies as core of the theory. In H. Giles (Ed.), Communication accommodation theory: Negotiating personal relationships and social identities across contexts (pp. 36-59). Cambridge University Press.

Fatima, M., Mahmood, M., & Saeed, M. (2025). Exploring language, class, and identity in Shaw’s Pygmalion: An analysis through communication accommodation theory. Wah Academia Journal of Social Sciences, 4(1), 850-871.

Giles, H. (Ed.). (2016). Communication accommodation theory: Negotiating personal relationships and social identities across contexts. Cambridge University Press.

Muir, K., Joinson, A., Cotterill, R., & Dewdney, N. (2016). Characterizing the linguistic chameleon: Personal and social correlates of linguistic style accommodation. Human Communication Research, 42(3), 462-484.

Sharma, D. (2025). The style game: Control, cues, and anchors in real time speech accommodation. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 29(1), 210-222.

Shetewi, O. (2023). Accommodation patterns in the speech of Arabic-speaking children and adolescents: A variationist analysis. Languages, 8(4), 236.

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Brooks/Cole.

Trepte, S. (2006). Social identity theory. In J. Bryant & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Psychology of entertainment (pp. 255-271). Routledge.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.