Vol. 25 No. 8 (2026): Musytari: Neraca Manajemen, Akuntansi, dan Ekonomi, ISSN 3025-9495
Articles

STRATEGI ORGANISASI DALAM MEMBANGUN KETAHANAN PADA ERA DISRUPSI: SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

Liza Rizqi
Universitas Lancang Kuning
Adi Rahmat
Universitas Lancang Kuning

Published 2026-07-05

Keywords

  • Strategi organisasi,
  • Era disrupsi,
  • organizational resilience,
  • strategic agility,
  • transformasi digital,
  • VUCA
  • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

STRATEGI ORGANISASI DALAM MEMBANGUN KETAHANAN PADA ERA DISRUPSI: SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW. (2026). Musytari : Jurnal Manajemen, Akuntansi, Dan Ekonomi, 25(8). https://doi.org/10.2238/d10zdw12

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi digital, globalisasi, dan meningkatnya ketidakpastian lingkungan bisnis mendorong organisasi melakukan transformasi strategis untuk mempertahankan daya saing dan ketahanan. Penelitian ini bertujuan mensintesis literatur mengenai strategi organisasi dalam membangun organizational resilience pada era disrupsi. Kajian difokuskan pada konsep disrupsi dan lingkungan VUCA, dampaknya terhadap strategi organisasi, transformasi model bisnis digital, tantangan manajemen modern, serta faktor-faktor yang mendukung organizational resilience. Penelitian menggunakan metode Systematic Literature Review (SLR) dengan pedoman PRISMA 2020. Penelusuran literatur dilakukan pada basis data Scopus dan Web of Science, menghasilkan 21 literatur utama yang dianalisis menggunakan sintesis tematik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa era disrupsi menggeser strategi organisasi dari pendekatan statis menuju strategi yang adaptif, lincah, berbasis data, dan berorientasi pada inovasi. Transformasi digital dipahami sebagai perubahan menyeluruh yang mencakup strategi, struktur, budaya, kepemimpinan, proses bisnis, dan pengembangan kompetensi sumber daya manusia. Keberhasilan organisasi dalam menghadapi lingkungan VUCA dipengaruhi oleh strategic agility, dynamic capabilities, kepemimpinan digital, budaya pembelajaran, dan tata kelola yang adaptif. Temuan ini memperkuat hubungan antara transformasi strategis dan organizational resilience sebagai dasar pengembangan strategi organisasi.

References

  1. Bennett, N., & Lemoine, G. J. (2014). What VUCA really means for you. Harvard Business Review, 92(1–2), 27–42.
  2. Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. (2013). Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37:2.3
  3. Christensen, Clayton M., Raynor, Michael E., & McDonald, Rory. (2015). What is disruptive innovation? Harvard Business Review, 93(12), 44–53.
  4. David, F. R., David, F. R., & David, M. E. (2020). Strategic management: A competitive advantage approach, concepts and cases (17th ed.). Pearson.
  5. Doz, Y. L., & Kosonen, M. (2010). Embedding strategic agility: A leadership agenda for accelerating business model renewal. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 370–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.006
  6. Duchek, S. (2020). Organizational resilience: A capability-based conceptualization. Business Research, 13(1), 215–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-019-0085-7
  7. Foss, Nicolai J., & Saebi, Tina. (2017). Fifteen years of research on business model innovation: How far have we come, and where should we go? Journal of Management, 43(1), 200–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316675927
  8. Grant, R. M. (2021). Contemporary strategy analysis (11th ed.). Wiley.
  9. Jacobides, Michael G., Cennamo, Carmelo, & Gawer, Annabelle. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2255–2276. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2904
  10. Kane, G. C., Palmer, D., Phillips, A. N., Kiron, D., & Buckley, N. (2015). Strategy, not technology, drives digital transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review & Deloitte University Press.
  11. Kane, G. C., Phillips, A. N., Copulsky, J., & Andrus, G. (2019). The technology fallacy: How people are the real key to digital transformation. MIT Press.
  12. Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. EBSE Technical Report, EBSE-2007-01.
  13. Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Harvard Business School Press.
  14. Lengnick-Hall, Cynthia A., Beck, Tammy E., & Lengnick-Hall, Mark L.. (2011). Developing a capacity for organizational resilience through strategic human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 21(3), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2010.07.001
  15. Millar, C. C. J. M., Groth, O., & Mahon, J. F. (2018). Management innovation in a VUCA world: Challenges and recommendations. California Management Review, 61(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125618805111
  16. Nambisan, Satish, Wright, Mike, & Feldman, Maryann P.. (2019). The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes. Research Policy, 48(8), 103773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.018
  17. Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. The BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  18. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. The BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  19. Parker, G. G., Van Alstyne, M. W., & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Platform revolution: How networked markets are transforming the economy and how to make them work for you. W. W. Norton & Company.
  20. Schoemaker, P. J. H., Heaton, S., & Teece, D. J. (2018). Innovation, dynamic capabilities, and leadership. California Management Review, 61(1), 15–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125618790246
  21. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
  22. Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007
  23. Teece, D. J., Peteraf, M., & Leih, S. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility: Risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy. California Management Review, 58(4), 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.13
  24. Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J. Q., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022
  25. Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
  26. Warner, Karl S. R., & Wager, Maximilian. (2019). Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal. Long Range Planning, 52(3), 326–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.12.001
  27. Westerman, G., Bonnet, D., & McAfee, A. (2014). Leading digital: Turning technology into business transformation. Harvard Business Review Press.
  28. World Economic Forum. (2023). The future of jobs report 2023. World Economic Forum.