Musytari : Jurnal Manajemen, Akuntansi, dan Ekonomi

Vol. 25 No. 11 (2026): Musytari: Neraca Manajemen, Akuntansi, dan Ekonomi, ISSN 3025-9495
Articles

PENGARUH PEMANFAATAN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TERHADAP EFIKASI DIRI AKADEMIK MAHASISWA PERGURUAN TINGGI DI SURABAYA

PDF
  • Amanda Nathania,
  • Muhammad Zaid,
  • Amaliyah
Amanda Nathania
Departemen Bisnis, Fakultas Vokasi, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
Muhammad Zaid
Departemen Bisnis, Fakultas Vokasi, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
Amaliyah
Departemen Bisnis, Fakultas Vokasi, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia

Published 2026-10-29

Keywords

  • pemanfaatan kecerdasan buatan,
  • efikasi diri akademik,
  • self-regulated learning,
  • mahasiswa,
  • regresi linear sederhana

How to Cite

PENGARUH PEMANFAATAN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TERHADAP EFIKASI DIRI AKADEMIK MAHASISWA PERGURUAN TINGGI DI SURABAYA. (2026). Musytari : Jurnal Manajemen, Akuntansi, Dan Ekonomi, 25(11). https://journal.cib.institute/index.php/musytari/article/view/5899

Abstract

Penggunaan kecerdasan buatan (Artificial Intelligence/AI) generatif di kalangan mahasiswa terus meningkat, tetapi dampaknya terhadap keyakinan mahasiswa atas kemampuan akademiknya belum konsisten. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui pengaruh pemanfaatan AI terhadap efikasi diri akademik mahasiswa perguruan tinggi di Surabaya. Pemanfaatan AI diukur melalui delapan dimensi strategi regulasi belajar (Liu dkk., 2025), sedangkan efikasi diri akademik diukur melalui tujuh dimensi (Greco dkk., 2022). Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan teknik convenience sampling. Data dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner daring (Google Form) dengan skala Likert 5 poin dari 62 mahasiswa di 10 perguruan tinggi di Surabaya. Analisis dilakukan dengan jamovi melalui uji validitas, reliabilitas, asumsi regresi (normalitas residual dan linearitas), dan regresi linear sederhana. Seluruh butir instrumen valid, dan kedua variabel reliabel (α = 0,958 untuk X dan α = 0,954 untuk Y). Hasil regresi menunjukkan bahwa pemanfaatan AI berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap efikasi diri akademik (β = 0,503; t = 5,89; p < 0,001) dengan R² = 0,366, yang berarti pemanfaatan AI menjelaskan 36,6% variasi efikasi diri akademik. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa pemanfaatan AI yang terarah dan teregulasi dapat mendukung keyakinan mahasiswa terhadap kemampuan akademiknya. Keterbatasan penelitian ini adalah jumlah sampel (62) yang belum mencapai minimal 97 responden sehingga generalisasi hasil terbatas.
PDF

References

  1. Acosta-Enriquez, B. G., Arbulú Ballesteros, M. A., Guzman Valle, M. de los A., Morales Angaspilco, J. E., Aquino Lalupú, J. del R., Bravo Jaico, J. L., Germán Reyes, N. C., Alarcón García, R. E., & Janampa Castillo, W. E. (2025). The mediating role of academic stress, critical thinking and performance expectations in the influence of academic self-efficacy on AI dependence: Case study in college students. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, Article 100381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100381
  2. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
  3. Borgstede, M., & Scholz, M. (2021). Quantitative and qualitative approaches to generalization and replication: A representationalist view. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 605191. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.605191
  4. Bouzar, A., El Idrissi, K., & Ghourdou, T. (2024). ChatGPT and academic writing self-efficacy: Unveiling correlations and technological dependency among postgraduate students. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), Special Issue on ChatGPT, 225–236. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/ChatGPT.15
  5. Chegg. (2025). Chegg Global Student Survey 2025. Chegg, Inc. https://www.chegg.org/global-student-survey-2025
  6. Fatimah, S., Manuardi, A. R., & Meilani, R. (2021). Tingkat efikasi diri performa akademik mahasiswa ditinjau dari perspektif dimensi Bandura. Prophetic: Professional, Empathy and Islamic Counseling Journal, 4(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.24235/prophetic.v4i1.8753
  7. Gerlich, M. (2025). AI tools in society: Impacts on cognitive offloading and the future of critical thinking. Societies, 15(1), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010006
  8. Ghozali, I. (2021). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 26. Universitas Diponegoro.
  9. Greco, A., Annovazzi, C., Palena, N., & Steca, P. (2022). Self-efficacy beliefs of university students: Examining factor validity and measurement invariance of the new academic self-efficacy scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 498824. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.498824
  10. Jebb, A. T., Ng, V., & Tay, L. (2021). A review of key Likert scale development practices in social science research. Methods in Psychology, 5, Article 100079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2021.100079
  11. Jia, W., Pan, L., & Neary, S. (2025). Effect of GenAI dependency on university students' academic achievement: The mediating role of self-efficacy and moderating role of perceived teacher caring. Behavioral Sciences, 15(10), Article 1348. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15101348
  12. Jin, S.-H., Im, K., Yoo, M., Roll, I., & Seo, K. (2023). Supporting students' self-regulated learning in online learning using artificial intelligence applications. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00406-5
  13. Liu, X., Xiao, Y., & Li, D. (2025). Assessing strategic use of artificial intelligence in self-regulated learning: Instrument development and evidence from Chinese university students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22, Article 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00567-5
  14. Morales-García, W. C., Sairitupa-Sanchez, L. Z., Flores, A., Pascual Mariño, J. J., & Morales-García, M. (2025). Influence of self-efficacy in the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and anxiety toward AI use on AI dependence among Peruvian university students. Data and Metadata, 4, Article 210. https://doi.org/10.56294/dm2025210
  15. Putri, A., & Trisnawati, N. (2025). Pengaruh penggunaan ChatGPT, regulasi diri dan dukungan sosial teman sebaya terhadap self-efficacy mahasiswa Pendidikan Administrasi Perkantoran. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v10i4.3889
  16. Rossanti, T., & Mudhar, M. (2025). The relationship between self-efficacy and academic stress among college students. QUANTA: Jurnal Kajian Bimbingan dan Konseling dalam Pendidikan, 9(2), 164–170. https://doi.org/10.24235/quanta.v9i2.6009
  17. Saftari, R., Mulyadi, H., & Supardi, E. (2025). Tracing the role of artificial intelligence in self-regulated learning: A systematic review using the Winne and Hadwin framework (2007–2025). JP (Jurnal Pendidikan): Teori dan Praktik, 10(1), 78–92. https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jp/article/view/44678
  18. Shahat, H. A., Badawy, M. E., Elballah, K. A., & Ibrahim-Shook, A. (2025). Self-efficacy as a mediator between ChatGPT usage and research motivation among postgraduate students. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 8(4), 987–996. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v8i4.7982
  19. Shi, J., Liu, W., & Hu, K. (2025). Exploring how AI literacy and self-regulated learning relate to student writing performance and well-being in generative AI-supported higher education. Behavioral Sciences, 15(5), Article 705. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15050705
  20. Tsekouras, G., Priante, A., & Ferdinands, M. (2025). Impact of GenAI collaboration patterns on student self-efficacy. Proceedings of the AIS SIGED International Conference on Information Systems Education and Research. https://aisel.aisnet.org/siged2025/1

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.