SOCIAL EXCLUSION PADA MANTAN NARAPIDANA: PEMETAAN BIBLIOMETRIK TREN RISET GLOBAL DAN IMPLIKASI BAGI KESEJAHTERAAN SOSIAL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2238/vpj8tp82Keywords:
social exclusion, former prisoners, social reintegration, stigma, bibliometric analysis, social welfare, mantan narapidana, reintegrasi sosial, bibliometrik, kesejahteraan sosialAbstract
Former prisoners represent one of the most vulnerable groups facing social exclusion after release, yet a systematic bibliometric mapping of global research on this topic from a social welfare perspective has never been conducted. This study aims to map research trends on social exclusion among former prisoners through a bibliometric analysis based on Google Scholar data retrieved via Publish or Perish, covering the period from 2016 to 2026. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) method was applied for article selection, and VOSviewer version 1.6.20 was used for keyword co-occurrence network visualization. Out of 995 articles initially identified, 467 articles met the eligibility criteria after undergoing identification, screening, and manual eligibility stages. The analysis produced a keyword network comprising 23 items distributed across 5 clusters with 234 links and a total link strength of 2,069. Social exclusion and ex-offender were confirmed as the most dominant keywords, while the five clusters formed reflect the dimensions of rehabilitation, reintegration barriers, lived experience of prisoners, sociological context, and the role of community. The most significant finding is the near-complete absence of social welfare and social work perspectives from the existing literature landscape, alongside the limited representation of digital dimensions and developing country contexts such as Indonesia. This study is expected to serve as a foundation for developing a more targeted social welfare research agenda and strengthening social reintegration policies for former prisoners in Indonesia. Mantan narapidana merupakan salah satu kelompok paling rentan menghadapi pengucilan sosial pasca pembebasan, namun pemetaan riset global tentang topik ini dari perspektif kesejahteraan sosial belum pernah dilakukan secara sistematis. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memetakan tren penelitian tentang social exclusion pada mantan narapidana melalui analisis bibliometrik berbasis data Google Scholar menggunakan aplikasi Publish or Perish dengan rentang tahun 2016 hingga 2026. Metode yang digunakan adalah PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) untuk proses seleksi artikel, dan VOSviewer versi 1.6.20 untuk analisis visualisasi jaringan kata kunci. Dari total 995 artikel yang ditemukan, sebanyak 467 artikel dinyatakan memenuhi kriteria eligibilitas setelah melalui tahapan identifikasi, screening, dan eligibility manual. Hasil analisis menghasilkan peta jaringan dengan 23 items kata kunci yang terbagi ke dalam 5 kluster dengan 234 links dan total link strength sebesar 2.069. Social exclusion dan ex offender terkonfirmasi sebagai kata kunci paling dominan, sementara lima kluster yang terbentuk mencerminkan dimensi rehabilitasi, hambatan reintegrasi, pengalaman hidup narapidana, konteks sosiologis, dan peran komunitas. Temuan paling signifikan adalah absennya perspektif kesejahteraan sosial dan pekerjaan sosial dalam keseluruhan peta literatur, serta minimnya penelitian yang mengangkat dimensi digital dan konteks negara berkembang seperti Indonesia. Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat menjadi landasan bagi pengembangan agenda riset kesejahteraan sosial yang lebih terarah dan penguatan kebijakan reintegrasi sosial mantan narapidana di IndonesiaReferences
Akunesiobike, C. A., Ogbonda, K., & Muhammad, H. I. (2025). The paradox of social cohesion in the reintegration of ex-offenders: A case study of Port Harcourt maximum security prison, Nigeria. African Journal of Social Issues, 8(1), 1–18.
Díez-Ripollés, J. L., & García-España, E. (2019). RIMES: An instrument to compare national criminal justice policies from the social exclusion dimension. International e-Journal of Criminal Sciences, 13, 1–35.
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Farrall, S., & Maruna, S. (2004). Desistance-focused criminal justice policy research. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(4), 358–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2311.2004.00336.x
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Prentice-Hall.
Hakim, L. N. (2022). Reintegrasi sosial narapidana di Indonesia: Tantangan dan peluang dalam perspektif pekerjaan sosial. Jurnal Ilmu Kesejahteraan Sosial, 23(1), 1–15.
Harahap, N. (2025). Exploring the lived experience of social reintegration among paroled ex-convicts in the Indonesian context. Hukmuna: Journal of Law and Policy, 2(1), 1–15.
Kurdi, M. S., & Kurdi, M. S. (2021). Analisis bibliometrik dalam penelitian bidang pendidikan: Teori dan implementasi. Journal on Education, 3(4), 518–537. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v3i4.2858
LeBel, T. P. (2012). Invisible stripes? Formerly incarcerated persons' perceptions of stigma. Deviant Behavior, 33(2), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2010.538365
Loosemore, M., Daniele, F., & Lim, B. T. H. (2020). Integrating ex-offenders into the Australian construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 38(6), 560–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2019.1674449
Marsal, A. P., & Silva, E. B. da. (2023). A literature review on social rehabilitation programs for ex-prisoners in enhancing quality of life. Journal of Social Science Studies, 3(2), 1–12.
Maruna, S. (2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10430-000
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLOS Medicine, 18(3), e1003583. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003583
Perpetua, A. M., Nkuna, P. S., Mthembu, S. T., & Govender, S. (2021). Perpetrators at first, victims at last: Exploring the consequences of stigmatization on ex-convicts' mental well-being. SAGE Open, 11(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211040483
Rade, C. B., Desmarais, S. L., & Mitchell, R. E. (2016). A meta-analysis of public attitudes toward ex-offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(9), 1260–1280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854816655837
Travis, J., Western, B., & Redburn, S. (Eds.). (2014). The growth of incarceration in the United States: Exploring causes and consequences. National Academies Press.
Trottier, D. (2017). Digital vigilantism as weaponisation of visibility. Philosophy & Technology, 30(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-016-0216-4
Uggen, C., Manza, J., & Thompson, M. (2006). Citizenship, democracy, and the civic reintegration of criminal offenders. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 605(1), 281–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716206286898
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Visher, C. A., & Travis, J. (2003). Transitions from prison to community: Understanding individual pathways. Annual Review of Sociology, 29(1), 89–113. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100011
Western, B., & Pettit, B. (2010). Incarceration and social inequality. Daedalus, 139(3), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_a_00019
Widodo, J. (2019). Pembinaan narapidana berbasis masyarakat di Indonesia. Jurnal Pemasyarakatan, 18(2), 45–62.
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
